1 Peter 2:2

1 Pet 2:2 [Textus Receptus]
ὡς ἀρτιγέννητα βρέφη τὸ λογικὸν ἄδολον γάλα ἐπιποθήσατε ἵνα ἐν αὐτῷ αὐξηθῆτε

1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Sinaiticus (א or 01) (4th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Alexandrinus (A) (5th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209 (B or 03) (4th century)] 101a c2
ως αρτιγεννητα βρεφη το λογικον αδολον γαλα επιποθησατε ϊνα εν αυτω αυξηθητε εις σωτηριαν

1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Ephraemi Syri Rescriptus (C) (5th century)]

1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Claromontanus (D) (5th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Boernerianus (G) (9th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 1 (12th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 43 (8409) (11th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 57 ((Gr. 9) (12th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 81 (Add MS 20003) (1044)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 104 (Harley MS 5537) (May 1087)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 201 (Add MS 11837) (11th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 312 (Add MS 5115) (11th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 321 (Harley MS 5557) (12th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 365 (12th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 385 (Harley MS 5613) (May 1407)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 479 (Cod. Migdana Gr. 3) (13th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 491 (Add MS 11836) (11th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 496 (Add MS 16184) (13th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 498 (Add MS 17469) (144th century) f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 605 (Grec. 216) (10th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 641 (Add MS 22734) (11th century)] f.

1 Pet 2:2 [Minuscule 1424 (9th/10th century)] f.

Critical Apparatus :

(1) Omit εις σωτηριαν :

(2) εις σωτηριαν : B

Early Church Fathers

A Textual Commentary On 1 Pet 2:2

The copies of greatest authority have long read, εἰς σωτηρίαν : in the more recent ones, an hiatus has been introduced, the eye of one or two copyists having glided from εἰς to εἴπερ in the next verse. (Johann Albrecht Bengel, Gnomon 5, p53)

“In many MSS., Versions, and Fathers is added εἰς σωτηρίαν ; which reading is adopted by almost all recent Critics. Yet, though it is well supported, I cannot but suspect it (with Mill and Wolf) to be a gloss ; since for its omission in so many MSS. no reason can be imagined; but its addition is easily accounted for. Wolf moreover thinks, that, had the Apostle chose to add any thing further, he would have written εἰς ἄνδρα τέλειον ; as Eph. 4.13.” (S. T. Bloomfield, Recensio Synoptica Annotationis Sacrae Being A Critical Digest & Synoptical Arrangement Of The Annotations On The New Testament – Vol. 8, 1828, p. 650-651)

“The words εἰς σωτηρίαν are undoubtedly genuine; see Tischendorf’s note.” (Charles Bigg, A Critical & Exegetical Commentary On The Epistles Of St Peter & St Jude (ICC), 1905, p. 126)

This entry was posted in 21. Πέτρου Αʹ. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.